Before I begin, I just want to make one thing clear. This is just my scenario of how a super conference would look for the top four conferences after expansion.
The biggest issues with super conferences is number one, money. Will teams bring in money to the conference, and, enough so that the pot does not get watered down? I think televisions look at this the wrong way. Ratings are not generated by the number of people viewing a university, or, by the number of people in a given area. Ratings are generated by how good your product is and does. Generating the best product (i.e., conference) you can, that offers good competition will bring viewers from all over. The SEC has good ratings because they offer a good product with great competition. If your product is good, anyone, regardless of conference affiliation will view your product.
WEST
|
CENTRAL
|
EAST
|
BIG XII
| ||
1. Oklahoma
2. Texas
3. Oklahoma St.
4. TCU
5. Texas Tech.
6. Baylor
|
1. Kansas St.
2. Notre Dame
3. West Virginia
4. Louisville
5. Iowa St.
6. Kansas
|
1. Florida St.
2. Clemson
3. Miami
4. Virginia Tech.
5. N.C. State
6. Pittsburgh
|
SEC
| ||
1. Texas A&M
2. LSU
3. Missouri
4. Arkansas
5. Ole Miss.
|
1. Alabama
2. Auburn
3. Miss. St.
4. Kentucky
5. Vanderbilt
|
1. Florida
2. South Carolina
3. Georgia
4. Tennessee
5. North Carolina
|
B10
| ||
1. Minnesota
2. Nebraska
3. Northwestern
4. Iowa
5. Illinois
6. Cincinnati
|
1. Michigan
2. Ohio St.
3. Michigan St.
4. Purdue
5. Indiana
6. Virginia
|
1. Penn St.
2. Maryland
3. Georgia Tech.
4. Duke
5. Rutgers
6. Syracuse
|
PAC 12
| ||
1. USC
2. UCLA
3. Stanford
4. California
5. Arizona
|
1. Oregon
2. Oregon St.
3. Washington
4. Washington St.
5. Boise St.
|
1. BYU
2. Utah St.
3. Colorado
4. Arizona St.
5. New Mexico St.
|
Winners and Losers:
After expansion is completed, who are the final winners and losers?
BIG XII
The Big XII is the overall winner in this scenario because their arm now reaches from central United States across to the east. Their new territory also brings heavy competition for the SEC and BIG for recruiting, exposure, and viewers. In addition, the competition level is strong and can only enhance each of their universities as the years pass. Furthermore, imagine the level of competition in all their sporting events, especially football and basketball; hell even baseball. This scenario also keeps and creates new rivalries. If this is not a good scenario for a perfect conference, I do not know what is.
SEC
The SEC will always have good competition, and the football crown, until someone can dethrone them. Adding A&M and Missouri proved to be a good fit for them in both football and basketball. Now adding North Carolina will given them that additional university in the east they were looking for. It also creates a new rivalry for South Carolina. Their overall sporting events will continue to good competition for years to come.
BIG
Adding Maryland and Rutgers only adds viewers, but not competition. The goal should have been to add a university that could bring in more viewers on top of what they already have, not just settling for the viewers a university already has. However, adding universities in the Southeast gives them those east viewers they were looking for. In the end, the BIG does not gain much and is still the third best conference.
ACC
The ACC is the obvious loser in this scenario. Because of their distance from other top notch universities, they have slim pickings from around their regional area. Adding BYU and Boise St. does help them out though when it comes to viewers and bringing in more funding. Although Boise St. is still a smaller university, they are gradually winning viewers as long as they can compete and upset the bigger universities.
No comments:
Post a Comment