Friday, December 30, 2011

Marriage destroyed by celebrities


Is it just me, or have celebrities really trashed the morals behind marriage? This is something you really don’t hear discussed, because everyday a celebrity marriage ends, that means money to the ones that report it. 

Getting back to celebrities; it really irks me when a celebrity couple gets married after dating for two days, and ends up divorcing after twenty-four hours. I don’t know which celebrities holds the record for quickest marriage and divorce, but this is really turning into an epidemic. 

I also hold those who consider themselves clergymen, pastors, etc. and the state accountable for allowing something like this to occur. I also hold them accountable for allowing them to divorce so easily without first sending them through a counselor to work out their marriage issues.  I know when I got married, I spent a weekend with the church I attended; taking classes to make sure this was a step in my life I was ready to take. That, and being with my wife for five years before we even got to this stage in our lives. Having said that, are these celebrities taking marriage classes? Do they really have an understanding of what marriage really is?  Because I really don’t think they do.

I think celebrities see marriage as a thing that happens when two people love each other and then break it off when it doesn’t work.  Hey, you know what we call that in the real world, DATING! Maybe you should try it sometime.

The union of marriage is sacred and with the good also comes the bad. Both good and bad are nothing uncommon in a real marriage. The first sign of danger in a marriage is what real people call, an argument; and we work to resolve the issue together.

I guess people think it must be a whole different world when you have money.  I just think you’re of very low morals and have very little to no respect for the one who holds marriage sacred.

The Secret American Socialism

I said in my last posting that America has changed to a Socialistic society. I am not saying this to make anyone mad. I’m just saying this because that is what I believe. The following is the definition of Socialism:

“An economic system characterized by social ownership of the means of production and cooperative management of the economy; or a political philosophy advocating such a system. "Social ownership" may refer to any one of, or a combination of, the following: cooperative enterprises, common ownership, direct public ownership or autonomous State enterprises.”

After reading the definition, do you think I am wrong? You see, our government and the propaganda they use, say that America is a Democracy. Our government says we are free, but people are being arrested for protesting against Wall Street. A little hypocritical when this government demands Middle Eastern countries to allow their people to conduct peaceful protests, don’t you think?

Getting to the point I’m trying to make. Our country may be a Democracy to a point, but it becomes Socialism when we hear about those backroom deals involving congress and see whose there. This country cannot run without money, and congress will not turn the other cheek when they see a bribe coming from a mile away. 

So, have you figured out why I say we are in a Socialistic society? The definition does not say that Socialism has to only be implemented by a government.

I do not care one way or the other for Obama, but for those people who say he is taking us into a Socialistic society, guess what? We already are and always have been.

Money is socialism and it is run by those that run our government.

Thursday, December 29, 2011

The greatest heist

Robberies occur throughout the United States everday. Tonight, a person trying to feed their family will rob a store, stealing less than one hundred dollars. The person will try to conceal his identity, and commit the crime within a given amount a time as not to get caught by authorities. In the end, the person is either killed or captured and thrown into prison for a few years.

This year, our government and banks behind closed doors, planned a strategy to save this country, which in the end cost the citizens of America everything, and them, nothing. Try to compare a robbery less than one hundred dollars to that of a robbery in the billions. Justice was done for the person who stole one hundred dollars, but those that stole in the billions, still hold either execute positions or government seats with kick-backs.

It saddens me to see the citizens of this country fight amongst ourselves for the scraps the upper class throw to us like dogs.  I know we are all trying to make it, but at whose cost? In a time where Capitalism was strong, the greatest heist in American history took place and turned our once proud America into a Socialistic society.  But that is another conversation.

So, how do we handle this situation. My suggestion to this dilemma would be to vote out every longstanding congressman. Get new blood into those chairs. Furthermore, submit a bill during the next session that will only allow a person to hold a seat in Congress for three terms, and cannot run after their third term. In addition, include a bill that would require banks to pay back all funds loaned out by the American Government. If we end government corruption, we end the heist from continuing.